Wentworth
Institute of Technology
Assessing research-doctorate programs : a methodology study /
How should we assess and present information about the quality of research-doctorate programs? In recommending that the 1995 NRC rankings in Assessing the Quality of Research-Doctorate Programs: Continuity and Change be updated as soon as possible, this study presents an improved approach to doctora...
Saved in:
| Corporate Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Electronic eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Washington, D.C. :
National Academies Press,
©2003.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
Full text (Wentworth users only) |
| Local Note: | ProQuest Ebook Central |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000cam a2200000 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | in00000210016 | ||
| 006 | a o 00| || | ||
| 006 | a |s 0|| || | ||
| 006 | m d | ||
| 006 | sux wss 0 2 | ||
| 007 | cr cnu---unuuu | ||
| 008 | 040310s2003 dcu obs 000 0 eng d | ||
| 005 | 20240807150746.2 | ||
| 010 | |a 2003113741 | ||
| 019 | |a 61395140 |a 70771500 |a 488484929 |a 614701459 |a 647301008 |a 666922482 |a 722212520 |a 811253134 |a 814267385 |a 923259562 |a 961668703 |a 961847766 |a 962589455 |a 971089020 |a 978699855 |a 978909682 |a 990588599 |a 991983908 |a 992041396 |a 1013773394 |a 1021251100 |a 1028779049 |a 1037938846 |a 1038675093 |a 1044629266 |a 1045217213 |a 1045379621 |a 1047531669 |a 1048151867 |a 1048242948 |a 1048749565 |a 1052756164 |a 1055313477 |a 1058830323 |a 1064738605 |a 1081270101 |a 1119507829 |a 1119514826 |a 1125439041 |a 1156363224 |a 1162497816 |a 1182014059 |a 1192530316 |a 1204394264 |a 1228574793 |a 1249232473 |a 1252403982 |a 1257350534 |a 1299426720 |a 1299454507 | ||
| 020 | |a 0309527082 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 9780309527088 |q (electronic bk.) | ||
| 020 | |a 1280179465 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781280179464 | ||
| 020 | |a 9786610179466 | ||
| 020 | |a 6610179468 | ||
| 020 | |z 030909058X |q (pbk.) | ||
| 020 | |z 9780309090582 |q (pbk.) | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)54672732 |z (OCoLC)61395140 |z (OCoLC)70771500 |z (OCoLC)488484929 |z (OCoLC)614701459 |z (OCoLC)647301008 |z (OCoLC)666922482 |z (OCoLC)722212520 |z (OCoLC)811253134 |z (OCoLC)814267385 |z (OCoLC)923259562 |z (OCoLC)961668703 |z (OCoLC)961847766 |z (OCoLC)962589455 |z (OCoLC)971089020 |z (OCoLC)978699855 |z (OCoLC)978909682 |z (OCoLC)990588599 |z (OCoLC)991983908 |z (OCoLC)992041396 |z (OCoLC)1013773394 |z (OCoLC)1021251100 |z (OCoLC)1028779049 |z (OCoLC)1037938846 |z (OCoLC)1038675093 |z (OCoLC)1044629266 |z (OCoLC)1045217213 |z (OCoLC)1045379621 |z (OCoLC)1047531669 |z (OCoLC)1048151867 |z (OCoLC)1048242948 |z (OCoLC)1048749565 |z (OCoLC)1052756164 |z (OCoLC)1055313477 |z (OCoLC)1058830323 |z (OCoLC)1064738605 |z (OCoLC)1081270101 |z (OCoLC)1119507829 |z (OCoLC)1119514826 |z (OCoLC)1125439041 |z (OCoLC)1156363224 |z (OCoLC)1162497816 |z (OCoLC)1182014059 |z (OCoLC)1192530316 |z (OCoLC)1204394264 |z (OCoLC)1228574793 |z (OCoLC)1249232473 |z (OCoLC)1252403982 |z (OCoLC)1257350534 |z (OCoLC)1299426720 |z (OCoLC)1299454507 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)ocm54672732 | ||
| 040 | |a N$T |b eng |e pn |c N$T |d OCLCQ |d YDXCP |d OCLCQ |d COF |d OCLCQ |d VRA |d OCLCQ |d ORU |d TNF |d OCLCQ |d IDEBK |d OCLCF |d NLGGC |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d INU |d DXU |d DKDLA |d ADU |d E7B |d COO |d WC1 |d EBLCP |d DEBSZ |d OCLCQ |d AZK |d VT2 |d OCLCO |d OCLCA |d OCLCQ |d TOA |d OCLCO |d AGLDB |d MOR |d PIFBR |d ZCU |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d MERUC |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d WY@ |d OCLCA |d BUF |d LUE |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d LIP |d KIJ |d U3W |d OCLCO |d STF |d WRM |d GILDS |d OCLCO |d VNS |d VTS |d COCUF |d NRAMU |d EZ9 |d ICG |d COBAS |d AU@ |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d WYU |d OCLCO |d OCLCA |d S9I |d UUM |d TKN |d GDC |d G3B |d DKC |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCLCO |d S9M |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d K6U |d SFB |d OCLCA |d AJS |d OCLCO |d OCL |d OCLCO |d OCLCQ |d OCL |d OCLCO |d OCLCL |d OCLCQ | ||
| 043 | |a n-us--- | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a Q180.U5 |b A87 2003eb | |
| 060 | 4 | |a 2010 K-137 | |
| 060 | 4 | |a LB 2386 | |
| 072 | 7 | |a SCI |x 043000 |2 bisacsh | |
| 072 | 7 | |a JD |2 bicssc | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 507.2 |2 22 |
| 084 | |a 02.13 |2 bcl | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Assessing research-doctorate programs : |b a methodology study / |c Jeremiah P. Ostriker and Charlotte V. Kuh, editors, assisted by James A. Voytuk ; Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs, Policy and Global Affairs Division, National Research Council of the National Academies. |
| 260 | |a Washington, D.C. : |b National Academies Press, |c ©2003. | ||
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (xi, 153 pages) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 347 | |a data file |2 rda | ||
| 504 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 65-66). | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a ""FrontMatter""; ""Acknowledgments""; ""Contents""; ""List of Tables and Charts""; ""Executive Summary""; ""1 Introduction""; ""2 How the Study Was Conducted""; ""3 Taxonomy""; ""4 Quantitative Measures""; ""5 Student Education and Outcomes""; ""6 Reputation and Data Presentation""; ""7 General Conclusions and Recommendations""; ""References""; ""Appendixes""; ""Appendix A Committee and Panel Member Biographical Sketches""; ""Appendix B Program-Initiation Consultation with Organizations""; ""Appendix C Meetings and Participants""; ""Appendix D Sample Questionnaires"" | |
| 505 | 8 | |a ""Appendix E Taxonomy of Fields and Their Subfields""""Appendix F Fields for Ph. D.s Granted During 1996-2001""; ""Appendix G Technical and Statistical Techniques""; ""Alternate Ways to Present Rankings: Random Halves and Bootstrap Methods""; ""Correlates of Reputation Analysis"" | |
| 520 | |a How should we assess and present information about the quality of research-doctorate programs? In recommending that the 1995 NRC rankings in Assessing the Quality of Research-Doctorate Programs: Continuity and Change be updated as soon as possible, this study presents an improved approach to doctoral program assessment which will be useful to administrators, faculty, and others with an interest in improving the education of Ph. D.s in the United States. It reviews the methodology of the 1995 NRC rankings and recommends changes, including the collection of new data about Ph. D. students, additional data about faculty, and new techniques to present data on the qualitative assessment of doctoral program reputation. It also recommends revision of the taxonomy of fields from that used in the 1995 rankings. | ||
| 546 | |a English. | ||
| 588 | 0 | |a Print version record. | |
| 590 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b Ebook Central Academic Complete | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Research |z United States |x Evaluation. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Doctor of philosophy degree |z United States |x Evaluation. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Science |x Study and teaching (Higher) |z United States |x Evaluation. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Engineering |x Study and teaching (Higher) |z United States |x Evaluation. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Humanities |x Study and teaching (Higher) |z United States |x Evaluation. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Science. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Physical sciences. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Health services administration. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Medical care. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Research. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Universities and colleges. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Life sciences. | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Education, Professional | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Science | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Quality of Health Care | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Natural Science Disciplines | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Education | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Health Services Administration | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Disciplines and Occupations | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Delivery of Health Care | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Anthropology, Education, Sociology and Social Phenomena | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Evaluation Studies as Topic | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Program Evaluation | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Investigative Techniques | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Research | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Evaluation Studies | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Universities | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Biological Science Disciplines | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Education, Graduate | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Patient Care Management |x methods | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Patient Care Management | |
| 650 | 2 | |a Patient Care | |
| 650 | 7 | |a sciences (philosophy) |2 aat | |
| 650 | 7 | |a physical sciences. |2 aat | |
| 650 | 7 | |a research (function) |2 aat | |
| 650 | 7 | |a colleges (institutions) |2 aat | |
| 650 | 7 | |a universities (institutions) |2 aat | |
| 650 | 7 | |a biological sciences. |2 aat | |
| 650 | 7 | |a science (modern discipline) |2 aat | |
| 651 | 2 | |a United States | |
| 655 | 2 | |a Statistics | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Statistics. |2 lcgft | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ostriker, J. P. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kuh, Charlotte V. | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Voytuk, James A. | |
| 710 | 2 | |a National Research Council (U.S.). |b Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs. | |
| 758 | |i has work: |a Assessing research-doctorate programs (Text) |1 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PCGqktj8qGtBCFmFKmVkyHP |4 https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/ontology/hasWork | ||
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Print version: |t Assessing research-doctorate programs. |d Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press, ©2003 |z 030909058X |w (OCoLC)53472887 |
| 852 | |b Ebooks |h ProQuest | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/wit/detail.action?docID=3375870 |z Full text (Wentworth users only) |t 0 |
| 938 | |a ProQuest Ebook Central |b EBLB |n EBL3375870 | ||
| 938 | |a ProQuest MyiLibrary Digital eBook Collection |b IDEB |n 17946 | ||
| 947 | |a FLO |x pq-ebc-base | ||
| 999 | f | f | |s 4ed9f33b-8631-42ed-b9e9-8d20e17df708 |i f13f5ee7-1c5c-411c-959d-4655d82f9f70 |t 0 |
| 952 | f | f | |a Wentworth Institute of Technology |b Main Campus |c Wentworth Library |d Ebooks |t 0 |e ProQuest |h Other scheme |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |t 0 |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/wit/detail.action?docID=3375870 |y Full text (Wentworth users only) |